Skip to main content

Carbon monoxide-oxidising Pseudomonadota on volcanic deposits

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) oxidising microorganisms are present in volcanic deposits throughout succession, with levels of vegetation and soil influencing the communities present. Carboxydovores are a subset of CO oxidisers that use CO as an energy source, which raises questions about the physiological and metabolic features that make them more competitive in harsh volcanic ecosystems. To address these questions, samples were taken from volcanic strata formed by eruptions from Calbuco Volcano (Chile) in 2015 (tephra) and 1917 (soil). Two carboxydovore members of the Burkholderiaceae family were isolated for further study to elucidate the benefits of carboxydovory for the survival of these strains in extreme volcanic ecosystems. The isolates were identified as Paraburkholderia terrae COX (isolated from the 2015 tephra) and Cupriavidus str. CV2 (isolated from the 1917 soil). 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that within the family Burkholderiacea, the genus Paraburkholderia dominated the 2015 volcanic deposit with an average relative abundance of 73.81%, whereas in the 1917 volcanic deposit, Cupriavidus accounted for 33.64% (average relative abundance). Both strains oxidise CO across a broad range of concentrations (< 100 ppmv – 10,000 ppmv), and genome sequence analysis revealed a candidate form-I carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH), which is likely to catalyse this process. Each strain oxidised CO specifically at stationary phase but the conditions for induction of CODH expression were distinct. Cupriavidus strain CV2 expressed CODH only when CO was added to cultures (100 ppm), while Pb. terrae COX expressed CODH regardless of supplementary CO addition. Based on comparative metabolic and phylogenetic analyses, Cupriavidus strain CV2 is proposed as a novel species within the genus Cupriavidus with the name Cupriavidus ulmosensis sp. nov. for the type strain CV2T (= NCIMB 15506 T, = CECT 30956 T). This study provides valuable insights into the physiology and metabolism of carboxydovores which colonise volcanic ecosystems.

Introduction

Soils act as a significant sink for CO due to microbial activity, accounting for removal of ~ 250–300 Tg yr−1 [1, 2]. Both aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms are capable of CO oxidation due to the use of a Mo–Cu or Ni–Fe carbon monoxide dehydrogenases (CODH), respectively [3, 4], although limited evidence is available to suggest that anaerobic CO oxidation plays a role in atmospheric CO consumption. CO oxidisers colonise diverse ecological niches, and isolates have been retrieved from terrestrial, aquatic, and even clinical samples [2, 5, 6]. CO oxidisers can be broadly classified into two groups according to the specific usage of CO; carboxydotrophs and carboxydovores. All known oxygen-tolerant CO-oxidising bacteria use Mo–Cu carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) to oxidise CO to CO2, yielding energy. coxMSL encodes the medium (FAD-binding), small (2 x [2Fe-2S]) and large (Mo–Cu) subunits of CODH, respectively, with CoxL containing the active site and critical molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide cofactor [7, 8]. Carboxydotrophs can grow using CO as the sole source of carbon and energy, with many isolates able to use high concentrations of CO (e.g. 10% (v/v) [2]. CODH catalyses the oxidation of CO to CO2, meaning that carboxydotrophs use pathways such as the Calvin-Benson-Basham cycle to fix the generated CO2 while also gaining ATP and NAD(P)H + H+ [9]. Conversely, while carboxydovores may oxidise high concentrations of CO they can also oxidise atmospheric levels but only benefit from this reaction by acquiring energy in the form of electrons coupled to ATP generation [1, 3].

The physiology, biochemistry, and genetics of carboxydotrophs have been studied in detail, with many studies focussing on the model bacterium Afipia carboxidovorans OM5T (formerly Oligotropha carboxidovorans OM5T) [9,10,11,12]. However, relatively few publications focus on bacterial carboxydovores in similar detail [1, 3, 5, 13]. Representatives from both groups use diverse metabolic strategies, as a common observation in carboxydovores is a switch from heterotrophy to CO oxidation as the cell begins to starve [1, 13, 14]. Conversely, the carboxydotroph Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ceases assimilation of carbon derived from CO oxidation when growing in the presence of organic carbon, instead using the energy from CO oxidation to enhance anabolism of carbon from heterotrophy [15]. Differing from both above examples, the carboxydotroph Mycobacterium sp. JC1 employs a mixotrophic approach where CO oxidation was detected in crude cell extracts during chemoautotrophic growth with CO and during heterotrophic growth while CO was present [16]. These examples highlight the metabolic versatility of CO-oxidisers from both groups, demonstrating that carboxydovores and carboxydotrophs are more complex in their lifestyle and metabolism than can be accounted for by the presence or absence of growth with CO as the sole carbon and energy source.

Trace gas oxidation is important during soil formation and development to fulfil the energy requirements of resident bacteria [17]. These processes account for 2–10% of reducing equivalent flow in young volcanic deposits from Kilauea Volcano [18], suggesting that the use of trace gases is a significant contributor to microbial life in such environments. As soils age and plant life develops, available organic carbon increases and the contributions of CO oxidation to microbial metabolism become less important [18]. Although, CO oxidation may continue to be supported through both atmospheric and biological sources [19]. Fresh volcanic deposits are harsh ecosystems, which present many challenges to microbial colonisers. pH varies spatially, in part due to acidification by volcanic ash [20], and organic matter is very limited but may be augmented through processes such as chemoautotrophy and chemolithotrophy [21, 22], necromass or allochthonous carbon deposition [23]. Additionally, without layers of soil, fresh deposits are not buffered against fluctuating temperature and potential desiccation. Such factors present significant challenges for microbial colonisation.

Recent studies have begun to demonstrate that carboxydovores are abundant and environmentally important [24], especially as this group is able to oxidise atmospheric CO [13]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to address the lack of cultured carboxydovore isolates by performing targeted enrichment and isolation of carboxydovore bacteria from volcanic deposits. This work also sought to advance our understanding of the physiological and metabolic strategies employed by CO-oxidising bacteria colonising these environments. A modified isolation method was developed to target bacteria that use low concentrations of CO as a supplementary energy source, leading to the isolation of two novel carboxydovore species within the Pseudomonadota (formerly Proteobacteria). Physiological, biochemical, and genomic analyses revealed their metabolic flexibility and unique adaptation to carbon limitation through CO utilisation. Furthermore, to better understand the relevance of these strains in the environmental samples from a microbial ecology perspective, 16S rRNA gene and functional gene (coxL) sequencing were employed to examine the diversity of the total microbial community and specifically CO oxidisers in volcanic deposits of different ages at Calbuco Volcano, Chile.

Materials and methods

Collection and chemical analysis of volcanic soils

Soil samples were collected in February 2022 from Calbuco Volcano (41.3304° S, 72.6087° W), Chile. Samples were taken from a tephra stratification (mostly ash, Fig S1) formed by eruptions in 1893, 1917, 1961 and 2015 (the most recent eruption), characterised by different levels of soil development. Physical details of the tephra stratification have been reported previously [25]. This site was used for grazing cattle circa 1940–1998 (Barbara Corrales, Parque Volcánico Valle Los Ulmos, Chile, pers. comm). Soil samples were collected in triplicate at a 30 cm depth horizontally using a shovel, between each tephra layer, into the vertical surface of the tephra strata (Figure S1) except for the topmost layer, which consisted only of volcanic rocks. Vegetation was removed before sampling. In the youngest deposit (2015), approximately 5 cm of volcanic rocks were removed before sampling to a depth that did not extend into the horizon of the 1961 stratum. The surface of the 2015 deposit was composed almost entirely of bare rock, primary basaltic andesite tephra [25], with very little soil observed. In contrast, the layers formed by preceding eruptions consisted of soil with little to no vegetation (Figure S1). Samples (~ 0.5 kg each) were stored in polyethylene bags (Ziploc bags) and transported immediately after sampling campaign to a laboratory in Chile, where they were refrigerated at 4 °C for approximately three months before being sent to our laboratory in the UK where they continued to be stored at 4 °C for a further 4 months prior to initial enrichments. The isolates discussed in this study were isolated from the tephra layers formed by eruptions in 2015 and 1917. Physico-chemical properties were measured by “Laboratorio de analysis de suelos y plantas”, Universidad de Concepción, Chile (see additional methods in the SI for more details, Table S1).

Targeted enrichment and isolation of carboxydovores from volcanic soil

Slurries were prepared by mixing volcanic soils with VL55 medium (pH 5.5, DSMZ recipe 1266) at a ratio of 1 g:1 ml, supplemented with 1 µl ml−1 vitamin solution (DSMZ recipe 1266). Media components were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, with the exception of MES hydrate (Formedium). Carbon sources were ~ 100 ppmv CO (CK Isotopes, UK) and 0.5 mM pyruvate to support mixotrophy (supplied as sodium pyruvate (Formedium)). The slurries were incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 100 rpm (Infors HT Ecotron). Headspace CO was measured daily (see Sect. “Measurement of headspace CO”) until it became undetectable, then the headspace was amended with approximately 100–200 ppmv CO. Following the consumption of three additions of CO (576 h for 2015 tephra enrichments, 150 h for 1917 soil enrichments), 1 ml of the enrichment medium (without soil matter) was transferred to 11 ml of fresh VL55 with 0.5 mM pyruvate and ~ 100 ppmv CO. Headspace analysis and amendments with CO were conducted under the same incubation conditions as above until a further 300 ppmv CO was consumed (500 h). The enrichment medium was diluted across a tenfold series to 10–5 and 100 µl of diluted enrichment medium was spread on solid VL55, set using 1.5% (w/v) Bacto agar (Fisher Scientific) and amended with 0.5 mM pyruvate. Plates were incubated at 30 °C (Sanyo MIR-153) until colonies formed over 7–10 days.

Colonies were screened for the presence of form-I coxL, the active site-containing component of CODH, using primers OMPf (5’-GGCGGCTT[C/T]GG[C/G]AA[C/G]AAGGT-3’) and O/BR (5’-[C/T]TCGA[T/C]GATCATCGG[A/G]TTGA-3’) [3]. The PCR protocol was conducted as described previously [3] with modifications to use colony biomass as the template. 5% (w/v) DMSO and 0.23% (w/v) BSA were added to the DreamTaq PCR mastermix (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA) and colony biomass was transferred directly to the PCR reaction mixture using a sterile pipette tip. The initial denaturation was maintained at 94 °C for 10 min in a G-Storm GS0002M thermal cycler (Labtech) to lyse cells and release the DNA template. Amplification cycles proceeded as follows: denaturation 94 °C – 45 s, touchdown annealing (62 °C initial annealing, decreasing by 1 °C per cycle to a final value of 58 °C, which was held for 30 cycles) – 60 s, then extension 72 °C – 90 s. Final extension was held for 20 min at 72 °C. PCR products were visualised using 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis, post-stained using 1 µl ml−1 GelRed Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium). Colonies that contained form-I coxL were re-inoculated in sterile VL55 medium with 2 mM pyruvate and 100 ppmv CO and incubated at 30 °C for up to 2 weeks with shaking at 100 rpm. Cultures that consumed CO were serially diluted across a tenfold series to 10–5 and spread on solid VL55 agar with 2 mM pyruvate. Colony morphology was examined for evidence of contamination and colonies were re-tested for the presence of form-I coxL. This process was repeated until pure cultures were obtained (2 × each). Two isolates were further characterised in this study and named Cupriavidus ulmosensis CV2T and Paraburkholderia terrae COX.

Cryo-scanning electron microscopy

All preparation steps were performed within the cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) preparation system PP30010T (Quorum Technologies). 1 mm blocks of VL55 agar were fitted on grooved stubs and dipped in nitrogen slush under vacuum. Samples were then transferred (still under vacuum) into the preparation chamber and sublimated at − 90 °C for 3 min before being sputter-coated with platinum. The samples were subsequently transferred into the SEM (Gemini-SEM 300, Zeiss GmbH). Images were acquired at 2 kV acceleration voltage using the secondary electron detector.

Cultivation of aerobic carboxydovores

The growth substrate ranges of each strain were tested by adding 5 mM of a carbon source to VL55 medium (pH 5.5) as the sole source of carbon and energy. 1 M carbon source stock solutions (Table S2) were prepared in distilled water and sterilised by passage through 0.2 µm syringe filters, then added to a final concentration of 2–5 mM in VL55 medium according to experimental requirements. All pure cultures were maintained at 30 °C with shaking at 150 rpm (Infors HT, Ecotron). Culture densities were recorded at 600 nm using a UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UK) with two biological replicates. The pH range of VL55 medium was buffered to pH 4.0 using citric acid-Na2HPO4 buffer (0.1 M and 0.2 M, respectively), pH 5.0–6.0 using MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid), and pH 7.0–8.0 using Trizma base. pH was adjusted using HCl or NaOH. pH tolerance experiments were conducted using 5 mM pyruvate to support growth at 30 °C in 20 ml final volume VL55 medium until stationary phase (48 h), using three biological replicates. Temperature and salinity tolerance experiments were conducted in 20 ml final volume VL55 medium using 5 mM pyruvate. Cultures were maintained until stationary phase (48–72 h) at 25 °C, 30 °C, 37 °C or 45 °C with shaking at 150 rpm (Infors HT, Ecotron) (n = 3). Salinity tolerance experiments were conducted at 30 °C using VL55 amended with 1% or 10% (w/v) NaCl (Formedium) (n = 3). To confirm that our isolates are carboxydovores (i.e. unable to grow using CO as the sole source of carbon and energy), each strain was initially grown using 5 mM pyruvate and 100 ppmv CO to induce CODH expression (see below). CO was added to the headspace of 120 ml vials, sealed using butyl rubber stoppers and aluminium crimp caps, from a 5,000 ppmv stock prepared in N2. Cultures were transferred into fresh VL55 medium with 1% (v/v) or 10% (v/v) CO as the sole carbon source, using three biological replicates per condition, then incubated for 17 days.

Measurement of headspace CO

CO was measured by injecting 100 µl of headspace gas into an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph fitted with an Agilent HP-Molsieve PLOT (Porous Layer Open Tubular) column (30 m length, 0.53 mm bore, 25 µm film, 7 inch cage) at an initial oven temperature of 50 °C, programmed at a rate of 10 °C/min to 100 °C with no initial hold time, injector at 250 °C (1:2 split ratio) and flame ionization detector at 300 °C (carrier gas He, 4 ml min−1). Headspace CO was quantified relative to standards (CK isotopes, UK) containing a known quantity of CO (1 ppmv – 11,000 ppmv) prepared in N2. The limit of detection of this GC apparatus for CO is approximately 500 ppbv.

Oxidation of elevated CO concentrations by carboxydovores

C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX were inoculated in VL55 medium with 5 mM pyruvate to support growth. The headspace of 120 ml vials was amended with 100 ppmv, 200 ppmv, 1,000 ppmv, 10,000 ppmv (1% v/v) or 100,000 ppmv (10% v/v) CO, using three biological replicates per condition. Headspace CO concentrations were measured by gas chromatography (as described in Sect. “Measurement of headspace CO”) for a maximum of 14 days, or until all detectable CO was consumed. Culture density (OD600) was measured using a spectrophotometer every 24 h until growth ceased.

Differential CO uptake activity under different growth conditions and stages of growth

The isolates were cultivated in 400 ml VL55 medium in 2 L flasks with 5 mM pyruvate ± 200 ppmv CO, using three biological replicates per condition. 10 ml aliquots of cultures were harvested at exponential phase (18–24 h) or stationary phase (72 h) by centrifuging at 4,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, followed by resuspension to an OD600 of 4.0 in 1 ml of fresh VL55 medium. Culture densities (OD600) were determined by tenfold dilution in sterile VL55 medium before measurement in a UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UK). Cell suspensions were kept on ice in sealed 30 ml vials during transfer to a 30 °C water bath with shaking at 150 rpm. Vials were allowed to pre-warm for 3 min, then 200 ppmv CO was added to the headspace from a 5,000 ppmv stock of CO in N2. After a further 1 min, a headspace sample was measured by gas chromatography (Sect. “Measurement of headspace CO”). Headspace samples were measured every 7.5 min until six samples had been taken. Abiotic VL55 medium and heat-killed cell controls were tested under the same conditions. Additionally, the effect of pH on CO uptake was tested by growing C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX in VL55 medium buffered to pH 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, or 8.0, depending on pH tolerance. Cells were harvested at stationary phase and the rate of CO consumption was measured (as above).

Genome sequencing and annotation

DNA was extracted from late-exponential phase bacterial cultures (OD600 = 0.6) grown in VL55 medium with 5 mM pyruvate using the Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G DNA isolation kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

The strains were initially identified by amplifying the 16S rRNA gene using primers 27F/1492R [26], and Sanger sequencing was conducted by Eurofins Genomics (UK). Subsequently, whole genome sequencing was performed by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK). Genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: input DNA was increased twofold, and PCR elongation time was increased to 45 s. DNA quantification and library preparation were carried out on a Hamilton Microlab STAR automated liquid handling system (Hamilton Bonaduz AG, Switzerland). Libraries were sequenced on an lllumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, USA) using a 250 bp paired end protocol. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.30 [27] and the quality was assessed using in-house scripts combined with the following software: Samtools [28], BedTools [29] and bwa-mem [30]. De novo assembly was performed using SPAdes version 3.7 [31], and contigs were annotated using Prokka 1.11 [32]. The assembly metrics were calculated using QUAST (v5.0.2) [33]. Completion and contamination metrics for the two isolates were performed using CheckM program [34]. Identification was done using the software Kraken [35] and Sina (v1.6.0) [36] using Silva 16S rRNA gene sequence database (release 128). Genome sequence annotation of both isolates were performed using MicroScope (https://mage.genoscope.cns.fr/microscope (accessed 05/06/2023)), an online platform by GenoScope (France) providing a collection of bioinformatic tools for annotation. Médigue et al. [37] has described all the software and databases integrated in the MicroScope pipelines used to perform the genome annotation.

The form-I CODH-encoding genes (coxMSL) from A. carboxidovorans OM5T [38] were used as queries in tBLASTn analysis against our genomes to identify putative cox gene clusters. The translated CoxL component was aligned against a database of corresponding CoxL sequences using MEGA11 [39] to confirm the presence of the form-I CoxL active site motif (AYXCSFR) [21]. The genomes were uploaded to the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST—https://rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi) server for subsystems analysis. As Pb. terrae COX lacked cell division and cell cycle-related genes (according to RAST analysis), this genome was uploaded to BLASTKOALA (https://www.kegg.jp/blastkoala/) for KEGG mapping using default parameters.

To determine whether our two isolates were members of previously undescribed species, the genome sequence data were uploaded to TYGS (https://tygs.dsmz.de) for whole-genome based taxonomic analysis and for dDDH (digital DNA-DNA hybridisation) computed with GGDC (Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator) [40]. Information on nomenclature, synonymy and associated taxonomic literature was provided by TYGS’s sister database, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN, available at https://lpsn.dsmz.de) [41]. Additionally, using Microbial Genomes Atlas Online (MIGA [42]), average nucleotide identity (ANI) was calculated. Finally, average amino acid sequence identity (AAI) was calculated using the BLAST tool with aai.rb scripts in Enveomics platforms [42], and confirmed with the outputs from automated multi-locus species tree analysis (autoMLST) [43], using default settings with bootstrapping performed by IQ-Tree Ultrafast Bootstrap Analysis (1000 replicates). The recommended species cut-off was 95% for ANI and ~ 70% for AAI indices [44].

In silico chemotaxonomic analysis was conducted using MicroScope. Specifically, comparative analysis of MicroCyc metabolic pathways was performed using the genome of C. ulmosensis CV2T against available PkGDB genomes of other Cupriavidus spp.

Soil DNA extraction and qPCR

To evaluate the abundance of our isolates in the total microbial composition, amplicon sequencing was performed on the soil DNA from the sites where the strains were isolated. All DNA extractions were performed using three soil replicates. Total DNA from 2.25 g 2015 and 1917 soil samples (n = 3) was extracted using a DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA extracted from soils was cleaned using a DNeasy PowerClean Pro Cleanup kit (Qiagen) and stored at −20 °C until ready for use.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) primers were designed specific to coxL from C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX using Primer3 (version 3.0.1, https://Primer3.org) with follow-up testing using primerBLAST with the respective genome sequences included to ensure specificity and that no non-specific products < 1,000 bp were predicted. OligoAnalyzer (Integrated DNA Technologies) was used to ensure the lack of predicted hairpins ∆G < −2.0 kcal/mol and the lack of self-dimers ∆G <  − 6.0 kcal/mol. The only exception was COX-qcoxL_rev, which was predicted to self-dimerise more than 4 bp from the 3’ end (∆G >  − 6.3 kcal/mol) and thus was accepted. Heterodimer analysis thresholds were set at ∆G ≥ −6.0 kcal/mol within 4 bp of the 3’ end. Primer sequences were as follows: CV2-qcoxL_fwd (5’- GGCTGCTCTCGTCTATCCCG-3’) and CV2-qcoxL_rev (5’-TGCCACGATGGACACCACAT-3’); COX-qcoxL_fwd (5’-CCAGTTCAAGTCGGTCAAGGA-3’) and COX-qcoxL_rev (5’-CACCGAATGGGAACGTGAAG-3’). The reaction mixture was prepared using 10 µl SensiFast SYBR Hi-Rox (Meridian Bioscience, Nottingham, UK), 0.8 µl of each primer (10 µM), 5–15 ng soil DNA/1 µl of coxL DNA standard, and water to 20 µl. qPCR was run using a Step 1 Plus instrument (Applied Biosystems, software version 2.2.2). Cycle conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min, 30 cycles (95 °C for 1 min, 65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, reading at 82 °C for 10 s), then melt curve analysis (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, then stepwise increases of 0.3 °C to a final 95 °C with reading for 15 s). Melt curve analysis produced single peaks from known standards (below) at Tm 87.4 °C for COX-qcoxL_fwd and COX-qcoxL_rev, and Tm 88.4 °C for CV2-qcoxL-fwd and CV2-qcoxL_rev reactions. coxL gene abundance in environmental samples was calculated against standards, which contained known numbers of copies of coxL from C. ulmosensis CV2T or Pb. terrae COX, generated by PCR using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK). Primers were designed to amplify the whole coxL gene from each strain using genomic DNA as a template. Primer sequences were as follows: CV2-coxL_fwd (5’-TCATCAGCCTGTCCTCAGGTTC-3’) and CV2-coxL_rev (5’-CACTGATCCGCAATGATCCCTC-3’); COX-coxL_fwd (5’-ACACGTCATGGGCAATCTCG-3’) and COX-coxL_rev (5’-GTACAACCTTCATGCGTGTCTC-3’). qPCR reaction efficiencies were as follows: CV2-coxL: 102.59% (R2: 0.999); COX-coxL: 100.31% (R2: 0.999). coxL copy numbers in environmental samples were normalised per gram of soil included in the original DNA extractions.

Total microbial community

Soil DNA was extracted as described in Sect. “Soil DNA extraction and qPCR”. Approximately 2.5 µg of DNA from the 1917 soil layer and ~ 85 ng of DNA from 2015 tephra was sent for 16S rRNA gene sequencing to Novogene UK. DNA was amplified with primers 341F (5’-CCTAVGGGRBCCASCAG-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3’) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was done using Illumina PE250 at Novogene, UK. For the 16S sequence analysis, LotuS2 version 2.19 [45] was used in short read mode, using default quality filtering on Galaxy Europe (https://usegalaxy.eu). Raw 16S rRNA gene amplicon reads were quality filtered to ensure a minimum length of 170 bp; no more than eight homonucleotides, no ambiguous bases, average quality ≥ 27; and an accumulated read error < 0.5 vis sdm [46]. Filtered reads were clustered using DADA2 into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) [47]. Postprocessing included uchime de novo and reference-based chimera removal [48], as well as back mapping operational taxonomic unit (OTU) sequences to a phi-X database for off-target removal [49]. The taxonomy to ASVs was assigned by RDP classifier (confidence threshold 80%) [50]. Abundance matrices were normalized using the rarefaction toolkit (RTK) [51].

For alpha-diversity, Shannon index, Simpson, the number of different species observed, and Species evenness were carried out using vegan package (version 2.6–6.1) in R (version 4.3.3). Alpha-diversity indexes were calculated based on the lowest number of sequences available (i.e., 74,386, subsampled using the rarefy function in vegan).

coxL amplicon sequencing

Soil DNA was extracted as described in Sect. “Soil DNA extraction and qPCR”, then coxL amplicon sequencing was performed on pooled environmental DNA by MRDNA Molecular Research (Shallowater, TX, USA). Triplicate soil DNA extractions were pooled in equal volume to a final 30 µl volume (1917: ~ 2.5 µg; 2015: ~ 85 µg). Primers specific to form-I coxL [3], with a barcode on the forward primer and a linker primer sequence GGCGGCTTYGGSAASAAGGT, were used according to King [3]. Amplicon sequencing was performed using DNA extracted from the 2015 (Barcode: ACTCAACA) and 1917 (Barcode ACTGATGT) deposits. PCR products were purified using Ampure PB beads (Pacific Bioscienes) and SMRTbell libraries (Pacific Biosciences) and sequencing was performed on the PacBio Sequel according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences were depleted of barcodes and primers and short sequences < 150 bp were removed. Sequences with ambiguous base calls were also removed. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined by clustering at 3% divergence (97% similarity) followed by removal of singleton sequences and chimeras using USEARCH [52]. To generate the specific coxL gene classifier, we used QIIME ‘qiime feature-classifier fit-classifier-naive-bayes command [53]. The classifier was trained using a curated custom database that included reference sequences and taxonomic files based on NCBI classification [54].

Statistical analysis

Statistically significant differences between conditions for CO consumption tests were compared in triplicate by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey post hoc test (included in R version 4.3.2). Statistical significance of qPCR (in triplicate) and diversity data (in triplicate) were determined by using Welch’s 2-sample T-test (package datarium version 0.1.0 (https://rdrr.io/cran/datarium/)).

Results

Targeted enrichment and isolation of carboxydovores

A modified enrichment strategy was used to isolate carboxydovores from volcanic strata formed after eruptions in 2015 (tephra) and 1917 (soil). Samples of the 1917 and 2015 strata consumed ~ 100 ppmv CO after 48 and 72 h, respectively, while initial slurries and sub-cultured enrichments continued consuming CO throughout 700-h incubations. After enrichment, two strains were successfully isolated, Cupriavidus ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX, isolated from 1917 and 2015 volcanic stratifications, respectively. C. ulmosensis CV2T is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped aerobic heterotrophic bacterium. Pb. terrae COX is also a Gram-negative, rod-shape aerobic heterotrophic bacterium.

qPCR specific to coxL from C. ulmosensis CV2T (CV2-coxL) and Pb. terrae COX (COX-coxL) was used to determine the abundance of these strains in the deposits from which they were isolated. The coxL gene associated with both C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX was significantly less abundant in the 1917 soil layer than the 2015 tephra layer (p ≤ 0.05) and were present at similar levels within the 1917 soil layer. In the 2015 tephra, 12,000 ± 2,300 copies CV2-coxL g−1 were present, which was significantly higher than the 3,800 ± 400 copies COX-coxL g−1 found in the 1917 soil layer (p ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Abundance of coxL genes specific to C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX in 2015 and 1917 volcanic deposits, determined by qPCR, normalised per gram of the soil/tephra material. Bars represent mean values with standard deviation of independent triplicates for each tephra layer. Differing letters denote statistically significant differences between the samples (p ≤ 0.05), determined by Welch’s T-test

Genome sequence analysis of novel carboxydovores

Strains C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX are similar to Cupriavidus basilensis strain DSM 11853 T (99.33% nucleotide ID with 16S rRNA, BioSample ID SAMN12697569, Bioproject PRJNA563568) and Pb. terrae strain KU-64 T (NBRC 100964, 99.73%, BioSample ID SAMD00391168, Bioproject PRJNA33175), respectively. The genome of C. ulmosensis CV2T is over 10 Mbp with a GC content of 64.8% (Table S3). The genome of Pb. terrae COX is also over 10 Mbp with a GC content of 62.0%. Additional genome information is listed in Table S3. C. ulmosensis CV2T, with an ANI of 92.3% and a dDDH of 47.5% to the closest type strain C. basilensis strain DSM 11853 T, was determined to be a member of a new species (Figures S2; S3), corroborated by autoMLST analysis. Pb. terrae COX had an ANI of 96.42% and a dDDH of 71.1% to the closest type strain Pb. terrae strain KU-64 T (NBRC 100964), confirming it to be Pb. terrae (Figures S4; S5).

The genomes of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX contain a large number of coding sequences (10,380 and 10,390, respectively). Subsystems analysis indicated various differences in the functional capacity of each strain; Pb. terrae COX had far more genes encoding roles in motility and chemotaxis, carbohydrate metabolism, and sulfur metabolism, while C. ulmosensis CV2T had more genes encoding roles in membrane transport, fatty acid metabolism and metabolism of aromatic compounds (Table S3). Individual clusters of three genes were identified on each genome that had homology with the form-I CODH (coxMSL) cluster of A. carboxidovorans OM5T (Fig. 2), and form-II CODH-encoding genes were also identified (coxSLM) in both bacteria. Inferred CoxL amino acid sequences from C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX were most closely related to other Pseudomonadota CoxL sequences (Fig. 3). C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX only possess a limited selection of the accessory cox genes (coxGDEF), which were initially identified in the CODH-encoding gene cluster from A. carboxidovorans OM5T (Fig. 2). Additionally, two distinct genes were present in the novel strains when compared to A. carboxidovorans OM5T; rcoM, encoding a putative transcription factor, and mocA, which encodes a molybdenum cofactor cytidylyltransferase (Fig. 2). The genome of C. ulmosensis CV2T indicated a capacity for trace gas utilisation beyond CO alone. A gene cluster encoding a putative Ni–Fe hydrogenase was detected, which shared the same genetic organisation with the hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium C. necator H16 (Figure S6). Pb. terrae COX lacked any recognisable hydrogenase-encoding genes on its genome.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Form-I CODH-encoding gene clusters from C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX. Translated amino acid identities (%) were calculated using BLASTp against homologous query sequences from the model type strain carboxydotroph Afipia carboxidovorans OM5T. Asterisk (*) indicates a hypothetical gene

Fig. 3
figure 3

Evolutionary relatedness of translated CoxL amino acid sequences. The tree was drawn using the Maximum Likelihood method with 500 Bootstrap replicates in MEGA11 [39]. MAGs were retrieved from Hernández et al. [71]

Genes with predicted roles in stress responses were analysed on the genomes of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX using the MicroScope genome annotation platform. Both strains possessed lexA genes, involved in the transcriptional regulation of SOS responses. Desiccation resistance was suggested, as both strains possessed otsAB genes involved in trehalose biosynthesis. Resistance to, or stress responses against, elevated temperatures was not suggested by the genomes of either strain, as very few heat shock protein-encoding genes were detected or genes encoding known chaperones involved in temperature responses, such as GroEL.

The genome of C. ulmosensis CV2T was further studied in comparison to previously reported Cupriavidus spp. to identify key areas of chemotaxonomic separation (Tables S4–S11). Amino acids biosynthesis reactions predicted by the genome analysis were similar among the compared species, as were carbohydrates biosynthesis, cell structures biosynthesis, fatty acids and lipids biosynthesis. C. ulmosensis CV2T had a similar number of predicted reactions for the Calvin-Benson-Basham cycle as C. necator N-1 T, which possess a full operon for autotrophic CO2 assimilation.

Physiological and metabolic characterisation

C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX grew using a relatively wide range of organic carbon sources (Table S2). However, C. ulmosensis CV2T was unable to use most of the sugars tested in this study, showing only weak growth with arabinose. In contrast, Pb. terrae COX showed growth on a broader range of organic compounds (Table S2). Similar temperature profiles were exhibited by each strain (Table S2). C. ulmosensis CV2T grew to the same final OD600 (0.51–0.53) at 25–30 °C, to a substantially lower OD600 at 37 °C (0.15), and failed to grow at 45 °C. Pb. terrae COX reached a slightly higher OD600 at 25 °C (0.40) than at 30 °C (0.34). Growth at 37 °C was slower (OD600 = 0.22) but consistent, while no growth was observed at 45 °C. C. ulmosensis CV2T grew at 0–1% NaCl and failed to grow at 10% NaCl, while 1% NaCl appeared to stimulate growth of Pb. terrae COX (OD600 = 0.48), but 10% NaCl inhibited growth entirely (Table S2).

Carboxydovory was confirmed as incubation of each strain with elevated concentrations of CO, with or without organic carbon, failed to facilitate growth (Figure S7; Figs. 4A, C). C. ulmosensis CV2T grew on 5 mM pyruvate between pH 5.0–8.0 (Figure S8), and Pb. terrae COX grew between pH 5.0–7.0 (Figure S9). After 24 h, C. ulmosensis CV2T had grown to a statistically similar OD600 at pH 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0, with a small but significant decrease in growth at pH 5.0 when compared to the other three conditions (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure S8). No statistically significant difference was detected after 48 h of growth. Additionally, no growth was observed at pH 4.0 over the course of the experiment by either strain. Pb. terrae COX grew to a significantly higher final OD600 at pH 7.0 than at any other pH (p ≤ 0.01) and remained significantly higher over the course of the experiment (Figure S9). No statistically significant difference in growth was observed between pH 5.0 or 6.0 over the course of the experiment, and no growth was observed at pH 4.0 or 8.0. A major physiological difference observed between the two strains was the production of copious amounts of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) by C. ulmosensis CV2T, which influenced colony morphology on plates due to increasingly mucoid appearance over time and was visible under scanning electron microscopy (Figure S10).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Growth of, and CO consumption by, bacterial strains. When determining statistically significant consumption of CO during CO tolerance experiments, one-way ANOVA was used to compare all timepoints within a given concentration. A) Growth of C. ulmosensis CV2T with 5 mM pyruvate combined with varying concentrations of headspace CO (0–10,000 ppmv) (OD600). B) Headspace CO (% remaining vs. timepoint 0) during growth with 5 mM pyruvate by C. ulmosensis CV2T. C) Growth of Pb. terrae COX with 5 mM pyruvate combined with varying concentrations of headspace CO (0–10,000 ppmv) (OD600). D) Headspace CO (% remaining vs. timepoint 0) during growth with 5 mM pyruvate by Pb. terrae COX. Bars represent mean values with standard deviation of independent triplicate incubations for each substrate

Consumption of elevated CO concentrations by carboxydovores

Both C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX consumed CO when grown in liquid culture with 5 mM pyruvate (Fig. 4A–D). 100 ppmv CO was consumed below detection by Pb. terrae COX after 5 days (Fig. 4D), with an initial lag period of approximately 2 days before CO was consumed. Similarly, C. ulmosensis CV2T exhibited a lag period of approximately 2 days before consuming CO from a 100 ppmv headspace (Fig. 4B). CO uptake was observed between 100–10,000 ppmv CO (Fig. 4), but not at 100,000 ppmv CO (data not shown), and notable differences in the lag period before CO consumption began were observed for each strain at different concentrations of CO (0–10,000 ppmv). C. ulmosensis CV2T consumed a significant amount of CO from the headspace of vials with 100 ppmv CO after 70 h (ANOVA: p ≤ 0.01), 200 ppmv CO after 94 h (p ≤ 0.001), 168 h for 1,000 ppmv CO (p ≤ 0.001), and 210 h for 5,000 ppmv CO (p ≤ 0.001) and 10,000 ppmv CO (1% v/v) (p ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 4B). Pb. terrae COX consumed a significant quantity of headspace CO after 70 h with an initial concentration of 100–200 ppmv (ANOVA: p ≤ 0.001), 168 h for 1,000 ppmv (p ≤ 0.01), 190 h for 5,000 ppmv (p ≤ 0.001) and did not consume a significant quantity of CO from the headspace with 10,000 ppmv (1% v/v) CO during the test period (Fig. 4D). C. ulmosensis CV2T consumed a significant quantity of CO at 5,000–10,000 ppmv CO with a shorter lag period than Pb. terrae COX, while the latter strain exhibited the shortest lag period before consuming a significant quantity of CO at 100–200 ppmv initial concentration (p ≤ 0.01), with similar consumption of CO at higher concentrations (Fig. 4D).

Regulation of CO consumption by growth conditions and growth phase

The rate of CO uptake during exponential and stationary phase was compared (Fig. 5A, 5B). For both strains, the rate of CO oxidation increased significantly during stationary phase compared to exponential phase for cells, which were grown on a combination of pyruvate and CO (ANOVA: p ≤ 0.01). Little to no CO uptake was detected in cells harvested at exponential phase for either strain. C. ulmosensis CV2T oxidised very little CO during stationary phase after growth with pyruvate alone (Fig. 5A), while Pb. terrae COX oxidised CO at a very similar rate during stationary phase regardless of the carbon sources available during growth (ANOVA: p ≥ 0.05) (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Rates of CO uptake (nmol/min/mg dry weight) by (A) C. ulmosensis CV2T and (B) Pb. terrae COX at stationary phase or exponential phase, varied according to the growth substrate. Bars represent mean values with standard deviation of independent triplicate incubations for each substrate. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences determined by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc test

It was unknown how variations in pH might impact the ability of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX to oxidise CO. C. ulmosensis CV2T oxidised CO at 0.81 ± 0.10 nmol CO/min/mg.dw at pH 5.0, with a decrease in the rate of CO oxidation from 0.55 ± 0.12 to 0.36 ± 0.28 nmol CO/min/mg.dw at pH 6.0 and 7.0, respectively (Figure S11A). The rate of CO oxidation increased significantly to 1.22 ± 0.21 nmol CO/min/mg.dw at pH 8.0 (p ≤ 0.01 vs. pH 7.0). Pb. terrae COX exhibited similar rates of CO uptake at each tested pH, with rates of 1.57 ± 0.34 and 2.08 ± 0.55 nmol/min/mg.dw at pH 5.0 and 7.0, respectively, but the rate of CO uptake was significantly lower at pH 6.0, measuring 1.02 ± 0.29 nmol/min/mg.dw (p = 0.05 vs. pH 6.0) (Figure S11).

Relative abundance of the Pseudomonadota and bacterial diversity in recent volcanic deposits

Amplicon sequencing was conducted on soil DNA from the sites where the strains were isolated to assess the abundance of these two isolates within the overall total microbial community. The bacterial communities that inhabited the 2015 and 1917 volcanic deposits were composed largely of Pseudomonadota (26.08% and 28.99% average relative abundance (RA), respectively), Actinomycetota (29.09% and 5.21% RA, respectively) and Acidobacteriota (10.79% and 26.02% RA, respectively) (Fig. 6A). Other groups in the context of CO oxidation included the Chloroflexota, which comprised 0.96% of the community in the 2015 tephra layer, compared to 8.01% in the 1917 layer.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Relative abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences in Calbuco stratifications originating from eruptions in 2015 and 1917. A Relative abundance of 16S rRNA of phyla. B Relative abundance of members of the Burkholderiaceae. Where the abundance of unclassified was lower than 0.8%, it was grouped into “Others”

Given that C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX are members of the Pseudomonadota, this group was studied in greater detail. Alphaproteobacteria dominated both the 2015 and 1917 volcanic deposits (32.97% and 34.99% relative abundance (RA), respectively), followed by Betaproteobacteria (12.22% and 18.01% RA, respectively) (Figure S12). The Burkholderiaceae comprised 32.54% and 5.26% of the Betaproteobacteria in the 2015 and 1917 strata and were dominated by the genus Paraburkholderia in the 2015 volcanic deposit (73.81% average RA), with a lower RA in the 1917 deposit (41.67% RA) (Fig. 6B). Cupriavidus spp. accounted for less of the Betaproteobacteria in the 2015 volcanic deposit (11.17% RA) but were greater at 33.64% RA in the 1917 volcanic deposit (Fig. 6B). The Shannon and Simpson indices of 16S rRNA nucleotide diversity were very similar across soil samples from both tested strata (Table S12), with no significant differences observed between the two sites analysed (p > 0.05 for Shannon, Simpson and Evenness). Although these differences were not statistically significant, 1917 soil (replicate 1) had the highest richness, indicating that it hosted the most species, while 1917 soil (replicate 3) hosted the least. In contrast, 2015 tephra (replicate 1) had the highest Shannon diversity (5.53), suggesting a more diverse ecosystem, whereas 1917 soil (replicate 3) had the lowest (4.52). This aligns with the Simpson values, where 2015 tephra (replicate 1) had the highest value (0.99), indicating a more diverse community, and 1917 soil (replicate 3) had the lowest (0.95). Additionally, 2015 tephra (replicate 1) had the most even community (0.76), while 1917 soil (replicate 3) had the least (0.65).

Community-wide analysis was conducted to determine how the CO-oxidising bacterial population changed over time following eruptions. Sequencing of coxL amplicons was used as a proxy for investigating the CO oxidiser community; coxL OTUs relating to the phylum Pseudomonadota were the most abundant in the 1917 (28.48%) soil layer, while the majority of coxL OTUs derived from the 2015 sediment were related to the Actinomycetota (60.41%) (Figure S13A). coxL OTUs relating to the Betaproteobacteria were less abundant than the Alphaproteobacteria in the 2015 tephra layer (Figure S13B) where CV2-coxL abundance was highest (Fig. 1). Betaproteobacteria coxL OTUs were slightly more abundant in the 2015 tephra layer than the 1917 soil layer (Figure S13B), with Betaproteobacteria OTUs in the 2015 layer corresponding entirely to the order Burkholderiales (Figure S13C). Burkholderiales coxL OTU abundance was similarly dominant in the 1917 soil layer. Within this order, the Burkholderiaceae were more abundant in the 2015 tephra layer (Figure S13D), although the Comamonadaceae were more abundant in the two strata. Collectively, OTUs corresponding to the Burkholderiaceae accounted for 0.1% of all OTUs. Twenty-four coxL OTUs related to the Burkholderiaceae were further analysed using BLASTn, with the highest identity sequences (78.34–98.79% nucleotide identity) belonging to the genera Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia. When alignments of translated CoxL amino acid sequences were phylogenetically analysed using the Maximum Likelihood method, one OTU was found to be closely related to CoxL from C. ulmosensis CV2T (OTU_6625) (Figure S14), while CoxL from Pb. terrae COX clustered most closely with OTU_12825.

Discussion

In this study, soil samples were collected from a stratigraphic profile formed by several layers of volcanic eruptions at Calbuco volcano, Chile. The two isolates characterised in this study were isolated from the 2015 tephra and from the 1917 soil strata. The higher organic matter content in the 1917 soil was likely due to the historic use of this site for grazing cattle circa 1940–1998 [Barbara Corrales, Parque Volcánico Valle Los Ulmos, Chile, pers. Comm].

CO-oxidising Pseudomonadota colonise volcanic tephra layers

In this study, conditions were adapted from previous enrichments [55] by using sufficiently low concentrations of pyruvate that CO consumption was unlikely to be inhibited [17, 56, 57], while providing 100 ppmv CO in regular doses as described previously [3] to reduce the likelihood of enriching carboxydotrophs, which are likely to use higher CO concentrations [2, 58]. Additionally, pH 5.5 (VL55 medium) was selected due to the use of this condition when enriching and isolating carboxydovores in previous work [5]. Rapid consumption of 100 ppmv CO was observed, confirming that the media composition was not inhibitory. This enrichment method led to the isolation of two members of the Pseudomonadota, C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX, a group that was previously noted for being highly abundant in vegetated volcanic deposits [17, 21, 59]. Pseudomonadota coxL gene abundance was positively correlated with increasing organic matter availability in vegetated volcanic soils [17], indicating the relevance of this phylum to environmental CO uptake.

Pb. terrae COX is a member of a well-known genus of CO-oxidising bacteria. CO-oxidising Burkholderia spp. and Paraburkholderia spp. have been isolated from many locations including >100-year-old vegetated deposits from Kilauea Volcano [55, 60]. To our knowledge, Pb. terrae has not been previously identified as a CO oxidiser. Conversely, Cupriavidus spp. is best known for autotrophy and, although a volcanic isolate is available [61], no CO oxidising species has previously been identified, even when form-II CODH was present [2].

Colonisation of volcanic deposits informed by genome sequencing

The form of CoxL was determined by identifying the characteristic form-I active site motif AYXCSFR [21] during alignment of the translated amino acid sequences with known form-I CoxL sequences (Fig. 3). Many BLAST results for CV2-coxL corresponded to form-II coxL in other Cupriavidus spp. (Table S13), indicating that CO oxidation using form-I CODH may be unusual in the genus Cupriavidus. Cupriavidus sp. UME74 (Genbank NUA31334.1), isolated from Portuguese forest soil, and Cupriavidus sp. SK-3, isolated from lagoon sludge contaminated by polychlorinated biphenyls [62], contain form-I coxL but no evidence of CO oxidation has been reported. The genetic layout of the cox gene clusters in C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX were identical, sharing a limited number of accessory cox genes (coxGDEF), rcoM, encoding a putative heme-containing CO-sensing transcription factor [63, 64] and mocA, encoding a molybdenum cofactor cytidylyltransferase that may facilitate the assembly of the molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide (MCD) cofactor required by CODH [65] (Fig. 2).

Carboxydovory was indicated by the genomes of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX due to the lack of a complete CO2 fixation pathway. However, each genome encodes a phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, meaning that assimilation of a small amount of carbon from CO through anaplerotic CO2 fixation following CO oxidation cannot be discounted [66]. Additional capacity for trace gas oxidation was indicated by the genome of C. ulmosensis CV2T due to the presence of a hydrogenase gene cluster. The ability to gain energy from the oxidation of both CO and H2 may provide a competitive advantage to carboxydovores over heterotrophs or other mixotrophs during the colonisation of volcanic deposits [67]. Hydrogenases are widely distributed in nature and can support microbial productivity when organic carbon is limited [68, 69], and their activity has been observed in volcanic cinders [70]. Evidence from genomes and studies with cultured isolates have demonstrated the use of both CO and H2 by many carboxydotrophs and carboxydovores [2, 13, 58, 67, 71, 72], suggesting that the use of both trace gases may be a relatively common strategy. Pb. terrae COX lacked a hydrogenase gene cluster, possibly contributing to the lower COX-coxL gene abundance observed compared to CV2-coxL in the 2015 tephra layer (Fig. 1) where organic carbon was lacking.

Biosynthetic and catabolic reactions predicted by the genome of C. ulmosensis CV2T were similar to those of other Cupriavidus spp. during MicroCyc analysis (Tables S4-S11). All six Cupriavidus spp. lacked many possible carbohydrate degradation genes, including glucose catabolism (Table S10), consistent with the inability of C. ulmosensis CV2T and other Cupriavidus spp. to grow using sugars (Table S2) [73]. An exception is C. basilensis OR16, which possesses a glucose dehydrogenase gene, permitting growth on glucose [74]. C. ulmosensis CV2T possessed many genes with predicted roles in hydrogen oxidation, which were not present in the compared Cupriavidus spp. genomes (Table S11; Figure S6). H2-oxidation is not universal in Cupriavidus spp., even closely-related ones, as the autotrophic C. necator H16 grows using H2 and CO2 [75] while C. necator N-1 T, which possesses a full operon for autotrophic use of CO2, possesses no genes for hydrogen oxidation, potentially preventing growth using trace gases alone [76]. Perhaps the most compelling chemotaxonomic marker to delineate C. ulmosensis CV2T from other Cupriavidus spp. is the ability to oxidise CO to CO2, the presence of form-I CODH, given the apparent rarity of form-I coxL across other isolated Cupriavidus spp. genomes, and the lack of autotrophic growth. Form-I CODH has not been mechanistically linked to CO oxidation in C. ulmosensis CV2T. Studies disagree on the role of form-II CODH (characterised by active site motif AYXGAGR), with some posing the form-II enzyme as an active CODH [77] and others suggesting inactivity [78]. Both Pb. terrae COX and C. ulmosensis CV2T possess the form-II CODH gene cluster (coxSLM), but the most likely source of CO oxidation is the form-I enzyme in each case, as a previous study of CO oxidation in strains possessing both form-I and form-II CODH-encoding gene clusters vs. strains possessing only form-II concluded that those possessing form-II alone could not oxidise CO [78].

Carbon utilisation, temperature, salt and pH tolerance of volcanic carboxydovores

Although the genus Cupriavidus can use a wide range of growth substrates, including sugars in some cases [79,80,81], C. ulmosensis CV2T was unable to grow using any of the sugars tested except arabinose, likely due to the lack of a gene encoding phosphofructokinase, as determined by KEGG analysis on the MicroScope annotation platform. Similarly, C. basilensis strain DSM 11853 T was unable to use glucose [73] as were nine of the 10 volcanic Cupriavidus spp. strains isolated from mud flows [61]. Pb. terrae COX grew well with most organic carbon sources tested, likely due to an intact glycolysis pathway permitting sugar utilisation, indicating that this strain would be the most effective at scavenging organic carbon sources in the environment. However, this apparent metabolic advantage was not reflected by the abundance of Pb. terrae COX when compared to C. ulmosensis CV2T (Fig. 1). Of the two strains isolated in this study, C. ulmosensis CV2T may be more likely to grow in changeable environments due to its broader pH tolerance (Figures S8; S9), but Pb. terrae COX may be more effective at employing a mixotrophic lifestyle under similar conditions due to the limited impact of pH on CO uptake (Figure S11). It is currently unclear whether changes in the rate of CO oxidation are due to the efficiency or expression of CODH at each pH. The lack of growth at acidic pH 4.0 was surprising, given that volcanic ash can significantly contribute to soil acidification [20]. However, the pH levels of the environmental samples, 8.24 (tephra 2015) and 7.1 (soil 1917), may have contributed to the lack of adaptation to growth at lower pH. Pb. terrae COX was unable to grow at pH 8.0 (Figure S9), likely inhibiting the growth of this strain in the 2015 tephra layer due to the alkaline pH (Table S1), while C. ulmosensis CV2T would be more likely to grow successfully under both pH conditions (Figure S8), potentially contributing to the higher abundance of this strain compared to Pb. terrae COX (Fig. 1).

Volcanic ecosystems present numerous challenges to resident microorganisms resulting from fluctuating temperature, desiccation, pH, among others. Both C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX grew similarly well at 25 °C and 30 °C but exhibited poor growth at 37 °C and no growth at 45 °C (Table S2). C. basilensis HMF14 was cultured up to 41 °C [82], suggesting a similar growth profile to C. ulmosensis CV2T. Pb. terrae strains isolated from temperate soils similarly had a temperature optimum of 28 °C [83], falling within the expected optimum temperature range of Pb. terrae COX (Table S2), and growth of these strains was inhibited above 2% NaCl. Similarly, growth was unimpeded between 0–1% (w/v) NaCl but was inhibited at 10% (w/v) NaCl (Table S2). Cupriavidus spp. have been reported to grow over a range of salinities, with some inhibited by as low as 0.5% NaCl while others tolerate 1.5% [84]. Collectively, these data suggest that both strains would be capable of growth under moderate conditions in the volcanic deposits, but that geothermal activity causing harsh temperature fluctuations, particularly in the upper stratum, would inhibit growth. The genomes of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX suggested resistance to desiccation resulting from trehalose biosynthesis (encoded by otsAB), which was previously reported during the desiccation-induced responses of other soil bacteria [85]. C. ulmosensis CV2T produced copious amounts of EPS during growth, also observed in C. baslensis HMF14 [82], which may contribute to the formation of biofilms that promote resistance to stressors such as desiccation and temperature, and sequesters cations from the soil [86]. Such adaptations may contribute to the significantly higher abundance of C. ulmosensis CV2T in the exposed 2015 tephra layer (Fig. 1). Desiccation resistance would be particularly beneficial in the 2015 tephra layer due to the lack of soil matrix contributing to more stable water availability [87]. The genome of Pb. terrae COX possesses a pgaABCD gene cluster, predicted to form poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (PGA), a key component in the formation of some biofilms [88]. Furthermore, two copies of the operon pelABCDEFG were located on the genome of Pb. terrae COX with predicted roles in biofilm formation. Pb. terrae BS001 also possessed the pga and duplicated pel operons [88], suggested to improve the suitability of this strain for colonising soils.

Oxidation of elevated concentrations of CO

The consumption of varying concentrations of CO by both strains further confirmed the use of carboxydovory. It was previously reported that carboxydovores were unable to grow using CO as the sole source of carbon and energy due to inhibition of CO oxidation at high concentrations of CO [57, 89], but the lack of any detriment to growth (Figs. 4A–C) at any tested CO concentration (Fig. 4B, D) in our isolates indicated that CODH activity may be inhibited by excessive CO concentrations, rather than any toxicity to broader cellular processes. The shorter lag period before C. ulmosensis CV2T consumed a significant quantity of CO at 5,000–10,000 ppmv CO indicated that higher concentrations of CO are less inhibitory to CODH activity in this strain compared to Pb. terrae COX (Figs. 4B; 4D). C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX use higher concentrations of CO less effectively when compared to many carboxydotrophs [58, 90] and carboxydovores [91], and more effectively than marine CO oxidisers such as Stappia aggregata [57]. CO tolerance was previously demonstrated using the autotrophic non-CO oxidiser C. necator H16, which acquired tolerance to 50% (v/v) CO during laboratory evolutions, compared to the wild-type strain was inhibited by ≥ 15% (v/v) CO [92]. As CO inhibited autotrophic growth in C. necator H16 rather than CODH activity, it is unknown whether tolerance to elevated CO could occur in a similar laboratory evolution study with C. ulmosensis CV2T. Little information is available in the literature to indicate the typical level of tolerance to CO in Paraburkholderia spp. The capacity of C. ulmosensis CV2 and Pb. terrae COX for oxidation of elevated CO is higher than appears to be necessary as environmental CO concentrations typically range from 60–300 ppbv [3].

Conservative and generalist regulation of CODH activity

Inhibition of CO uptake during growth on pyruvate (Figs. 4, 5) was consistent with previous reports of carboxydovores switching to trace gas oxidation during stationary phase [13], indicative of a starvation response. The differing regulation of CO oxidation by each strain, in spite of the apparent conservation in the cox gene clusters (Fig. 2), merits further study to better understand the mechanisms and regulation of carboxydovory in the environment. C. ulmosensis CV2T oxidised little to no CO at stationary phase when grown using pyruvate alone, likely indicating that CODH expression by this strain requires the presence of CO at greater than atmospheric concentrations (60–300 ppbv, [3]). Pb. terrae COX, meanwhile, oxidised CO at stationary phase regardless of CO concentrations during growth, indicating that CO uptake by Pb. terrae COX may not be regulated by the presence of elevated CO but, rather, by the presence or absence of other organic carbon sources.

The regulation of CODH expression is highly variable between different carboxydotrophs and carboxydovores. CODH expression is constitutive in some carboxydotrophs such as Pseudomonas carboxydoflava and Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava [15, 93, 94], although P. carboxydoflava begins to use gases such as CO and H2 only as supplementary energy sources (mixotrophy) when supplied with heterotrophic substrates. This was suggested to support P. carboxydoflava in assimilating surplus organic carbon [15]. This differs from the proposed usage of CO as a supplementary energy source by carboxydovores such as C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX, as carboxydovory may support these strains when starved of organic carbon as suggested previously [1, 13]. The novel Calbuco strains behave more similarly to S. aggregata (carboxydovore) and A. carboxidovorans (carboxydotroph), as CO oxidation by these strains was reduced or eliminated by organic carbon [38, 57]. Weber and King [57] suggested that glucose (or glucose metabolites) exerted allosteric repression on CODH expression in S. aggregata, even though this bacterium could not grow on glucose. Overall, the repression or modulation of CO oxidation by organic catabolites is a common phenomenon in both carboxydotrophs and carboxydovores. Carbon catabolite repression appears to be the most likely explanation for the observed regulatory profiles observed in C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX (Fig. 5). Organic matter is moderately abundant in the 1917 soil layer (Table S1), but the bioavailability of this carbon is unknown and therefore cannot be certain to inhibit CO oxidation in situ. Furthermore, while organic matter is very low in the 2015 tephra layer (Table S1), transient inputs of organic matter through wet and dry depositions [67] could promote heterotrophic growth while inhibiting CO oxidation.

The energetic advantages of the CODH expression profiles (Fig. 5) are not yet fully understood. C. ulmosensis CV2T may conserve energy by repressing CODH expression when ambient CO is absent, while Pb. terrae COX would benefit from transient increases in CO concentration immediately, particularly if atmospheric concentrations of CO can be consumed similar to other carboxydovores [1, 3]. In contrast, C. ulmosensis CV2T would need to synthesise the CODH enzyme each time it is exposed to CO. In an ecological context, while Pb. terrae COX may be able to acquire supplemental energy through CO oxidation more readily during periods of starvation, the conservative regulation of CODH by C. ulmosensis CV2T may make the latter strain better equipped to survive under certain conditions due to the smaller metabolic burden caused by expressing CODH less often (Fig. 5). As C. ulmosensis CV2T was more abundant in the 2015 tephra layer (Fig. 1), this strain may be more suited to colonising the harsh volcanic ecosystem. Detailed analysis of the metabolism and physiology of other carboxydovores may provide greater insight into the mechanisms of control of CO oxidation, particularly in extreme and changing ecosystems such as volcanic deposits.

Total microbial community

Further analyses were included to evaluate the relative abundance of these isolates within the total microbial composition at these sites. The abundance of the Pseudomonadota in the unvegetated 2015 tephra (Fig. 6A) was noteworthy as this group was also abundant in deposits from older/revegetated Llaima and Kilauea volcanoes [17, 59], consistent with the suggested correlation of this group with organic matter availability [17]. However, the Pseudomonadota were also the most abundant group in recent deposits from the Krafla volcanic field (Iceland) [95] and in deposits from Miyake-Jima (Japan) [96]. The similar diversity and richness indices of the 16S rRNA gene were intriguing when examined in the context of the increasing organic matter content between the 2015 and 1917 layers (Tables S1; S12). Weber & King [17] found that, as levels of organic carbon increased along a gradient of unvegetated to vegetated volcanic deposits, the microbial community was dominated by the Pseudomonadota in vegetated areas and the abundance and diversity of CO-oxidising bacteria was similarly greater. Conversely, deposits of varying age from Calbuco Volcano showed similar diversity indices (Table S12) and similar abundance of the Pseudomonadota despite increasing organic matter content (Fig. 6A; Table S1), coupled with lower abundance of the Actinomycetota and a greater abundance of the Myxococcota in the older deposit. Even within the Pseudomonadota, the alpha-, beta-, gamma- and delta- subgroups were similarly abundant between layers (Figure S12). A potential confounding explanation for the low observed diversity between layers is the possibility that members of the microbial community in the upper tephra layers could become vertically distributed through the lower strata, particularly when considering environmental factors such as rain.

The similar 16S rRNA gene diversity indices (Table S12) indicate that, although the community changes across the different strata (Fig. 6A), environmental factors were likely insufficient to drive substantial changes in microbial community diversity. The abundance of the Chloroflexota in the 1917 soil was also noteworthy, as this group was abundant in recent volcanic deposits at other sites [17, 59, 97] and both metabolic and metagenomic studies indicated the potential of this group for CO oxidation [5, 13, 71]. Previous studies have posited that the oxidation of trace gases such as CO is a key driver in colonising such ecosystems [59, 67, 98], an important step in soil succession.

16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated that the genus Cupriavidus was more abundant in the 1917 soil layer than the bare 2015 tephra (Fig. 6), which contrasts with strain-level data showing that coxL copies of C. ulmosensis CV2T were more abundant in the 2015 layer (Fig. 1). Conversely, the genus Paraburkholderia was more abundant overall in the 2015 tephra layer (Fig. 6) but coxL copy numbers of Pb. terrae COX were significantly less abundant in this deposit and slightly less abundant in the 1917 soil (Fig. 1). Confounding the interpretation of coxL gene abundance through qPCR is the fact that multiple coxL gene copies could bias the observed abundance. Single copies of form-I coxL were present on the genomes of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX. However, other strains, such as A. carboxidovorans OM5T, possess coxMSL on a plasmid [11], which could influence similar attempts at CO-oxidiser enumeration if multiple copies are present. Similarly, methods such as qPCR do not distinguish between DNA from living or dead cells, meaning that the true abundance of C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX could be lower than indicated (Fig. 1). A possible explanation for the lower abundance of CV2-coxL and COX-coxL g−1 soil in the 1917 soil layer compared to the 2015 tephra layer is that the increased availability of organic carbon would promote a more complex microbial community, but this is unlikely when considering the community diversity data (Table S12). Hernández et al. [59] found that total bacterial abundance was similar in Llaima Volcano deposits from 1957 (early soil formation, some lichen present), 1751 and 1640 (> 10–20 cm soil depth, plant colonisation) [99], but that microbial diversity was higher in the older deposits. King [67] found that increases in organic matter in sites with < 1% organic carbon led to a greater biomass of CO oxidising bacteria, lending a potential advantage over other heterotrophs.

coxL OTUs relating to the Pseudomonadota were similarly abundant between the 2015 and 1917 volcanic deposits (22.51–28.48%, respectively) (Figure S13A). By comparison, coxL genes relating to the Pseudomonadota comprised 2.6% of a coxL gene clone library from unvegetated deposits from Kilauea Volcano (Hawaii), compared to 70–75% for transitional and vegetated sites [17]. coxL from the Betaproteobacteria comprised 1.63 and 1.07% of Pseudomonadota-specific OTUs in the 2015 and 1917 deposits, respectively (Figure S13B). Weber & King [17] found that Betaproteobacteria coxL gene abundance was correlated with increasing vegetation in Kilauea Volcano deposits. Therefore, the consistently low abundance of Betaproteobacteria coxL OTUs in the Calbuco Volcano strata may be due to the lack of vegetation across the deposits. Many translated Calbuco coxL OTUs were grouped with known CoxL from Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia species (Figure S14), and the Burkholderiaceae were most abundant in the 2015 tephra (Figure S13D), contrary to previous observations of abundance increasing with vegetation [60]. The genus Cupriavidus spp. was far more abundant in the 1917 soil, although these data are unlikely to correspond to CO-degrading Cupriavidus spp. abundance as form-I coxL appears to be rare in this genus and only one coxL OTU closely related to C. ulmosensis CV2T coxL was detected in this study (Figure S14). 25% of culturable bacteria from bare and sparsely vegetated volcanic deposits from Mt. Pinatubo (the Philippines) were Cupriavidus spp., demonstrating the ability of this genus to colonise such ecosystems, but isolates from this environment were autotrophs characterised for their ability to oxidise hydrogen rather than CO-oxidisers [61, 100, 101].

The disparity between 16S rRNA abundance (Fig. 6) and coxL abundance (Fig. 1; Figure S13) strongly indicates that 16S rRNA abundance cannot provide information about the local CO oxidising community. Supporting this is the fact that CO oxidising C. ulmosensis CV2T was significantly more abundant in the bare 2015 tephra layer than the 1917 soil layer (Fig. 1), contrary to the total microbial community data (Fig. 6B). More work is required to understand the relationship between soil succession and the abundance of carboxydovores from the Pseudomonadota, as well as other groups. For example, Weber & King [17] demonstrated that coxL OTUs related to the Proteobacteria dominated vegetated sites, while coxL OTUs from this group are found in similarly moderate abundance in both the 2015 and 1917 Calbuco deposits (Figure S13A), potentially because of the similarly low levels of vegetation at the chosen sampling depth (Figure S1). Moreover, our classifier was unable to accurately identify members of the Burkholderiaceae to genus level when using coxL alone, meaning that the abundance of carboxydovores from the genera Cupriavidus and Paraburkholderia remains unclear. The curated custom coxL database used to construct the classifier contained only 56 sequences, which likely does not capture the full taxonomic diversity of coxL genes present in environmental samples. This limitation may contribute to reduced classification accuracy, as observed with members of the Burkholderiaceae, whose sequences may diverge significantly from those included in the reference database. No coxL OTUs from the Burkholderiaceae were identified as belonging to Cupriavidus spp. when analysed using BLASTn, but Maximum Likelihood analysis demonstrated that OTU_6625 (Burkholderia anthina 1CH1 according to BLASTn) was most closely related to CoxL from C. ulmosensis CV2T (Figure S14). CoxL from Pb. terrae COX was most closely related to OTU_12825 (Pb. terrae KU-46 according to BLASTn), indicating that the well-known CO oxidising genus Paraburkholderia can be more confidently identified using coxL sequences alone. This is unsurprising given that many CO oxidising species of Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia have been identified, their genomes sequenced, and coxL OTUs identified in the environment [102].

CO flux may be influenced by the Actinomycetota, as this phylum was abundant relative to the entire bacterial community (Fig. 6A) and 60.4% of coxL sequences were associated to this phylum in the 2015 tephra layer (Figure S13). Similarly, coxL relating to the Actinomycetota comprised 31% of coxL genes in a deciduous forest soil [102]. Carboxydotrophs and carboxydovores have been isolated from this group [2], and Mycobacterium spp. have been the subject of physiological and genetics studies [1, 103], which demonstrated their ability to consume environmentally relevant concentrations of CO. However, Lalonde & Constant [102] found that 14 coxL OTUs related to Mycobacterium spp. were not significantly linked to the rate of CO oxidation in forest soils, suggesting that this group may not always play an important role, but coxL OTUs from the Actinomycetota were well correlated with CO oxidation rates [102]. This study further indicates the potential relevance of the Actinomycetota for environmental CO uptake. It is noteworthy to mention that storing soils at 4 °C for three months could present some challenges for molecular DNA analysis, as DNA can degrade over time. While 4 °C slows down degradation compared to room temperature, it may not fully prevent it for extended periods, potentially resulting in lower-quality DNA that could impact downstream analyses.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates an effective strategy for enriching and isolating carboxydovore bacteria from volcanic soils. Two new strains are presented: C. ulmosensis CV2T, the first confirmed CO-oxidising member of this genus, and Pb. terrae COX, a member of a well-known group of CO-oxidising bacteria. Both new CO-oxidising isolates display metabolic flexibility like other carboxydovores, and the genomes of these strains indicate adaptations for surviving in harsh volcanic ecosystems. Both strains are capable of oxidising relatively high concentrations of CO (1% v/v), with consumption of CO observed down to relatively low levels specifically during stationary phase, suggesting that CO oxidation is used to gain supplemental energy during starvation. The regulations of CO oxidation by C. ulmosensis CV2T and Pb. terrae COX were distinct; while both repressed CODH activity during exponential phase, Pb. terrae COX consumed CO regardless of the gas being added during growth, while C. ulmosensis CV2T was far more conservative. This enhances our understanding of the potential controls of CO cycling by environmental factors and, crucially, increases the number of characterised carboxydovore isolates available in culture. Furthermore, the environmental significance of these strains, and of the CO-oxidising community, was considered. C. ulmosensis CV2T was significantly more abundant in the youngest volcanic deposit, while Pb. terrae COX maintained low abundance in both tested deposits, suggesting that CO oxidation by the genus Cupriavidus may be greater than previously considered. On a community level, the Pseudomonadota were surprisingly of similar abundance between the two tested layers and there was little difference in overall community diversity. Many coxL OTUs were phylogenetically closely related to Paraburkholderia spp., corroborated by the dominance of coxL OTUs from this group within the Betaproteobacteria. In summary, this study furthers our understanding of not just the diversity of the carboxydovores colonising volcanic ecosystems of varying ages but also provides valuable physiological and metabolic context through which we can understand the survival of carboxydovore bacteria in extreme ecosystems.

Further genomic comparisons of the isolate CV2T using MIGA, dDDH, ANI, and a set of 77 house-keeping genes using autoMLST, revealed similarities below the recommended ANI species-level thresholds (95% [104]) and DDH values (70% [105]) when the type strain genome sequences were used as query. Furthermore, C. ulmosensis CV2T is unusual by possessing a form-I CODH and is the first member of this genus confirmed to oxidise CO. C. ulmosensis CV2T is the representative of a novel species of the genus Cupriavidus within the order Burkholderiales (phylum Pseudomonadota). Based on this characterisation, we propose a new species, C. ulmosensis sp. nov.

Description of Cupriavidus ulmosensis sp. nov

C. ulmosensis sp. nov. (ul.mo.sen’sis. N. L. masc n. ulmosensis, of the Parque Valle Los Ulmos, referring to Parque Valle Los Ulmos in Chile, park named after the ulmo tree in Calbuco Volcano, where the strain was isolated).

The type strain C. ulmosensis CV2T (= NCIMB 15506 T, = CECT 30956 T), was isolated from soil of Calbuco Volcano in the Los Lagos Region, Chile. The genome is characterized by a size of 10.31 Mb and has a G + C content of 64.8 mol%. Gram-negative, rod-shaped aerobic heterotrophic bacterium, which produces copious extracellular polysaccharide visible under cryo-SEM (Figure S10). The isolate contains CODH-related genes and can grow in the presence of CO (100 – 100,000 ppmv CO). Cells grow at 25–37 °C at pH 5.0–8.0 (optimally at pH 7), tolerating 0–1% NaCl, and utilise a rage of non-sugar organic carbon sources in VL55 medium (pH 5.5).

Availability of data and materials

The genome sequences of the isolates have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank under the accession number PRJNA1001293 (SAMN36798297 for C. ulmosensis CV2T and SAMN36798260 for Pb. terrae COX). The 16S rRNA gene Sanger sequences have been deposited in NCBI under the accession numbers OR536588 for C. ulmosensis CV2T and OR536592 for Pb. terrae COX. The 16S rRNA gene and coxL gene sequencing data of the soils were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the Bioproject accession numbers PRJNA1036796 and PRJNA1165783, respectively.

Abbreviations

ANI:

Average nucleotide identity

AAI:

Average amino acid identity

ASV:

Amplicon sequence variant

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CODH:

Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase

dDDH:

Digital DNA–DNA hybridisation

MCD:

Molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide

OTU:

Operational taxonomic unit

qPCR:

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RA:

Relative abundance

SRA:

Sequence read archive

References

  1. Cordero PRF, Bayly K, Man Leung P, Huang C, Islam ZF, Schittenhelm RB, et al. Atmospheric carbon monoxide oxidation is a widespread mechanism supporting microbial survival. ISME J. 2019;13:2868–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. King GM, Weber CF. Distribution, diversity and ecology of aerobic CO-oxidizing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:107–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King GM. Molecular and culture-based analyses of aerobic carbon monoxide oxidizer diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7257–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Depoy AN, King GM, Ohta H. Anaerobic carbon monoxide uptake by microbial communities in volcanic deposits at different stages of successional development on O-yama Volcano, Miyake-jima Japan. Microorganisms. 2021;9:12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. King CE, King GM. Description of Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans sp. nov., a carbon-monoxide-oxidizing member of the class Ktedonobacteria isolated from a geothermally heated biofilm, and analysis of carbon monoxide oxidation by members of the class Ktedonobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1244–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stott MB, Crowe MA, Mountain BW, Smirnova AV, Hou S, Alam M, et al. Isolation of novel bacteria, including a candidate division, from geothermal soils in New Zealand. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2030–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer O, Frunzke K, Morsdorf G. 1993 Biochemistry of the aerobic utilization of carbon monoxide. In: Murrell JC, Kelly DP, editors. Microbial growth on C1 compounds. Andover, MA: Intercept Limited

  8. Johnson JL, Rajagopalan KV, Meyer O. Isolation and characterization of a second molybdopterin dinucleotide: molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990;283:542–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siebert D, Busche T, Metz AY, Smaili M, Queck BAW, Kalinowski J, et al. Genetic engineering of Oligotropha carboxidovorans strain OM5-A promising candidate for the aerobic utilization of synthesis gas. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9:1426–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schubel U, Kraut M, Morsdorf G, Meyer O. Molecular characterization of the gene cluster coxMSL encoding the molybdenum-containing carbon monoxide dehydrogenase of Oligotropha carboxidovorans. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:2197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuhrmann S, Ferner M, Jeffke T, Henne A, Gottschalk G, Meyer O. Complete nucleotide sequence of the circular megaplasmid pHCG3 of Oligotropha carboxidovorans: function in the chemolithoautotrophic utilization of CO, H2 and CO2. Gene. 2003;322:67–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilcoxen J, Hille R. The hydrogenase activity of the molybdenum/copper-containing carbon monoxide dehydrogenase of Oligotropha carboxidovorans. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:36052–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Islam ZF, Cordero PRF, Feng J, Chen YJ, Bay SK, Jirapanjawat T, et al. Two Chloroflexi classes independently evolved the ability to persist on atmospheric hydrogen and carbon monoxide. ISME J. 2019;13:1801–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Berney M, Cook GM. Unique flexibility in energy metabolism allows mycobacteria to combat starvation and hypoxia. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(1):e8614. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0008614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiessling M, Meyer O. Profitable oxidation of carbon monoxide or hydrogen during heterotrophic growth of Pseudomonas carboxydoflava. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1982;13:333–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YJ, Kim YM. Induction of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase during heterotrophic growth of Acinetobacter sp. strain JC1 DSM 3803 in the presence of carbon monoxide. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1989;59(1–2):207–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03111.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber CF, King GM. Distribution and diversity of carbon monoxide-oxidizing bacteria and bulk bacterial communities across a succession gradient on a Hawaiian volcanic deposit. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1855–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. King GM, Weber CF. Interactions between bacterial carbon monoxide and hydrogen consumption and plant development on recent volcanic deposits. ISME J. 2008;2:195–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. King GM, Crosby H. Impacts of plant roots on soil CO cycling and soil-atmosphere CO exchange. Glob Chang Biol. 2002;8:1085–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lubis RL, Juniarti SL, Rajmi AN, Armer FR, Hidayat HZ, Yulanda N, et al. Chemical properties of volcanic soil after 10 years of the eruption of Mt. Sinabung (North Sumatera, Indonesia). IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci. 2021;757(1):012043. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1755-1315/757/1/012043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunfield KE, King GM. Molecular analysis of carbon monoxide-oxidizing bacteria associated with recent Hawaiian volcanic deposits. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:4242–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly LC, Cockell CS, Thorsteinsson T, Marteinsson V, Stevenson J. Pioneer microbial communities of the Fimmvörðuháls Lava Flow, Eyjafjallajökull. Iceland Microb Ecol. 2014;68:504–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cockell CS, Olsson-Francis K, Herrera A, Meunier A. Alteration textures in terrestrial volcanic glass and the associated bacterial community. Geobiology. 2009;7:50–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quiza L, Lalonde I, Guertin C, Constant P. Land-use influences the distribution and activity of high affinity CO-oxidizing bacteria associated to type I-coxL genotype in soil. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Romero JE, Alloway BV, Gutiérrez R, Bertín D, Castruccio A, Gustavo Villarosa C, et al. Centennial-scale eruptive diversity at Volcán Calbuco (41.3°S; Northwest Patagonia) deduced from historic tephra cover-bed and dendrochronologic archives. J Volcanol Geothermal Res. 2021;417:107281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrant E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jobm.3620310616.

  27. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv: Genomics. 2013

  31. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i142–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20:257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: Accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Médigue C, Calteau A, Cruveiller S, Gachet M, Gautreau G, Josso A, et al. MicroScope-An integrated resource for community expertise of gene functions and comparative analysis of microbial genomic and metabolic data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1071–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Santiago B, Schübel U, Egelseer C, Meyer O. Sequence analysis, characterization and CO-specific transcription of the cox gene cluster on the megaplasmid pHCG3 of Oligotropha carboxidovorans. Gene. 1999;236:115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1471-2105-14-60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D801–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprs. 2016;4:e900v1.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W276–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Haque MFU, Hernández M, Crombie AT, Colin Murrell J. Identification of active gaseous-alkane degraders at natural gas seeps. The ISME J. 2022;16(7):1705–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41396-022-01211-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Özkurt E, Fritscher J, Soranzo N, Ng DYK, Davey RP, Bahram M, et al. LotuS2: an ultrafast and highly accurate tool for amplicon sequencing analysis. Microbiome. 2022;10:176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hildebrand F, Tadeo R, Voigt AY, Bork P, Raes J. LotuS: an efficient and user-friendly OTU processing pipeline. Microbiome. 2014;2:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Edgar RC. 2016 UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing

  49. Bedarf JR, Beraza N, Khazneh H, Özkurt E, Baker D, Borger V, et al. Much ado about nothing? Off-target amplification can lead to false-positive bacterial brain microbiome detection in healthy and Parkinson’s disease individuals. Microbiome. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40168-021-01012-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naïve bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Saary P, Forslund K, Bork P, Hildebrand F. RTK: efficient rarefaction analysis of large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2594–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D161–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Weber CF, King GM. Volcanic soils as sources of novel CO-oxidizing Paraburkholderia and Burkholderia: Paraburkholderia hiiakae sp. nov., Paraburkholderia metrosideri sp. nov., Paraburkholderia paradisi sp. nov., Paraburkholderia peleae sp. nov., and Burkholderia alpina sp. nov. a member of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Front Microbiol. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Weber CF, King GM. The phylogenetic distribution and ecological role of carbon monoxide oxidation in the genus Burkholderia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;79:167–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Weber CF, King GM. Physiological, ecological, and phylogenetic characterization of Stappia, a marine CO-oxidizing bacterial genus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1266–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mörsdorf G, Frunzke K, Gadkari D, Meyer O. Microbial growth on carbon monoxide. Biodegradation. 1992;3:61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hernández M, Calabi M, Conrad R, Dumont MG. Analysis of the microbial communities in soils of different ages following volcanic eruptions. Pedosphere. 2020;30:126–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Weber CF, King GM. Quantification of Burkholderia coxL genes in Hawaiian volcanic deposits. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Sato Y, Nishihara H, Yoshida M, Watanabe M, Rondal JD, Concepcion RN, Ohta H. Cupriavidus pinatubonensis sp. nov. and Cupriavidus laharis sp. nov., novel hydrogen-oxidizing, facultatively chemolithotrophic bacteria isolated from volcanic mudflow deposits from Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines. Int J Syst Evolution Microbiol. 2006;56(5):973–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1099/ijs.0.63922-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Vilo C, Benedik MJ, Ilori M, Dong Q. Draft genome sequence of Cupriavidus sp. strain SK-3, a 4-chlorobiphenyl- and 4-clorobenzoic acid-degrading bacterium. Genome Announc. 2014. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/genomeA.00664-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kerby RL, Youn H, Roberts GP. RcoM: a new single-component transcriptional regulator of CO metabolism in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:3336–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kerby RL, Roberts GP. Burkholderia xenovorans RcoMBx-1, a transcriptional regulator system for sensing low and persistent levels of carbon monoxide. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:5803–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Neumann M, Mittelstädt G, Seduk F, Iobbi-Nivol C, Leimkühler S. MocA is a specific cytidylyltransferase involved in molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:21891–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Braun A, Spona-Friedl M, Avramov M, Elsner M, Baltar F, Reinthaler T, et al. Reviews and syntheses: heterotrophic fixation of inorganic carbon - Significant but invisible flux in environmental carbon cycling. Biogeosciences. 2021;18:3689–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. King GM. Contributions of atmospheric CO and hydrogen uptake to microbial dynamics on recent Hawaiian volcanic deposits. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:4067–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC, Stott MB, et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J. 2016;10:761–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Islam ZF, Welsh C, Bayly K, Grinter R, Southam G, Gagen EJ, et al. A widely distributed hydrogenase oxidises atmospheric H2 during bacterial growth. ISME J. 2020;14:2649–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. King CE, King GM. Temperature responses of carbon monoxide and hydrogen uptake by vegetated and unvegetated volcanic cinders. ISME J. 2012;6:1558–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hernández M, Vera-Gargallo B, Calabi-Floody M, King GM, Conrad R, Tebbe CC. Reconstructing genomes of carbon monoxide oxidisers in volcanic deposits including members of the class Ktedonobacteria. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Meyer O, Schlegel HG. Reisolation of the carbon monoxide utilizing hydrogen bacterium Pseudomonas carboxydovorans (Kistner) comb nov. Arch Microbiol. 1978;118:35–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Steinle P, Stucki G, Stettler R, Hanselmann KW. Aerobic mineralization of 2,6-dichlorophenol by Ralstonia sp. strain RK1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(7):2566–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/AEM.64.7.2566-2571.1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Cserháti M, Kriszt B, Szoboszlay S, Tóth Á, Szabó I, Táncsics A, et al. De novo genome project of Cupriavidus basilensis OR16. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:2109–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Ishizaki A, Tanaka K, Taga N. Microbial production of poly-D-3-hydroxybutyrate from CO2. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;57:6–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Poehlein A, Kusian B, Friedrich B, Daniel R, Bowien B. Complete genome sequence of the type strain Cupriavidus necator N-1. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:5017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Hogendoorn C, Pol A, Picone N, Cremers G, van Alen TA, Gagliano AL, Jetten MSM, D’Alessandro W, et al. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide-utilizing Kyrpidia spormannii species from Pantelleria island, Italy. Front Microbiol. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Cunliffe M. Correlating carbon monoxide oxidation with cox genes in the abundant Marine Roseobacter Clade. ISME J. 2011;5:685–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Brigham CJ, Budde CF, Holder JW, Zeng Q, Mahan AE, Rha C, et al. Elucidation of beta-oxidation pathways in Ralstonia eutropha H16 by examination of global gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:5454–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Park JM, Kim TY, Lee SY. Genome-scale reconstruction and in silico analysis of the Ralstonia eutropha H16 for polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesis, lithoautotrophic growth, and 2-methyl citric acid production. BMC Syst Biol. 2011. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1752-0509-5-101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Pearcy N, Garavaglia M, Millat T, Gilbert JP, Song Y, Hartman H, et al. A genome-scale metabolic model of Cupriavidus necator H16 integrated with TraDIS and transcriptomic data reveals metabolic insights for biotechnological applications. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18: e1010106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Wierckx N, Koopman F, Bandounas L, De Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ. Isolation and characterization of Cupriavidus basilensis HMF14 for biological removal of inhibitors from lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Microb Biotechnol. 2010;3:336–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Pratama AA, Haq IU, Nazir R, Chaib De Mares M, van Elsas JD. Draft genome sequences of three fungal-interactive Paraburkholderia terrae strains, BS007, BS110 and BS437. Stand Genomic Sci. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40793-017-0293-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Cuadrado V, Gomila M, Merini L, Giulietti AM, Moore ERB. Cupriavidus pampae sp. nov., a novel herbicide-degrading bacterium isolated from agricultural soil. Int J Syst Evolution Microbiol. 2010;60(11):2606–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1099/ijs.0.018341-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Scales NC, Huynh KT, Weihe C, Martiny JBH. Desiccation induces varied responses within a soil bacterial genus. Environ Microbiol. 2023;25:3075–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bhagat N, Raghav M, Dubey S, Bedi N. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: insight into their role in plant abiotic stress tolerance. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;31:1045–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA, Ritchie JC, Sobecki TM, Bloodworth H. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma. 2003;116:61–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Haq IU, Graupner K, Nazir R, van Elsas JD. The genome of the fungal-interactive soil bacterium Burkholderia terrae BS001—A plethora of outstanding interactive capabilities unveiled. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:1652–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Hardy KR, King GM. Enrichment of high-affinity CO oxidizers in Maine forest soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:3671–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Cypionka H, Meyer O. Influence of carbon monoxide on growth and respiration of carboxydobacteria and other aerobic organisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1982;15:209–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Wu D, Raymond J, Wu M, Chatterji S, Ren Q, Graham JE, et al. Complete genome sequence of the aerobic CO-oxidizing thermophile Thermomicrobium roseum. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e4207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Wickham-Smith C, Malys N, Winzer K. Improving carbon monoxide tolerance of Cupriavidus necator H16 through adaptive laboratory evolution. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1178536.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Kang BS, Kim YM. Cloning and molecular characterization of the genes for carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and localization of molybdopterin, flavin adenine dinucleotide, and iron-sulfur centers in the enzyme of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5581–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Meyer O, Jacobitz S, Krüger B. Biochemistry and physiology of aerobic carbon monoxide-utilizing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;39:161–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Byloos B, Monsieurs P, Mysara M, Leys N, Boon N, Van Houdt R. Characterization of the bacterial communities on recent Icelandic volcanic deposits of different ages. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18:122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Guo Y, Fujimura R, Sato Y, Suda W, Kim S, Oshima K, et al. Characterization of early microbial communities on volcanic deposits along a vegetation gradient on the island of Miyake. Japan Microbes Environ. 2014;29:38–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Dragone NB, Whittaker K, Lord OM, Burke EA, Dufel H, Hite E, Miller F, Page G, Slayback D, Fierer N. The early microbial colonizers of a short-lived volcanic island in the Kingdom of Tonga. MBio. 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/mbio.03313-22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. King GM. Chemolithotrohic bacteria: distributions, functions and significance in volcanic environments. Microbes Environ. 2007;22:309–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Hernández M, Dumont MG, Calabi M, Basualto D, Conrad R. Ammonia oxidizers are pioneer microorganisms in the colonization of new acidic volcanic soils from South of Chile. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2014;6:70–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ogiwara K, Sekiguchi M, Waranabe M, Yoshida M, Ohta H. Vegetation recovery and soil microorganisms in volcanic mudflow deposits from Mt. Pinatubo, the Philippines. In: Abstracts of the Annual Meeting, Japanese Society of Soil Science and Plant Nutritio, vol. 45. 1999. p. 49.

  101. Sato Y, Nishihara H, Yoshida M, Watanabe M, Rondal JD, Ohta H. Occurrence of hydrogen-oxidizing Ralstonia species as primary microorganisms in the Mt. Pinatubo volcanic mudflow deposits. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2004;50(6):855–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/00380768.2004.10408546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Lalonde I, Constant P. Identification of unknown carboxydovore bacteria dominant in deciduous forest soil via succession of bacterial communities, coxl genotypes, and carbon monoxide oxidation activity in soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:1324–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. King GM. Uptake of carbon monoxide and hydrogen at environmentally relevant concentrations by Mycobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7266–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:249–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Barbara Corrales, Pablo Saumann, and the sampling team at Parque Volcánico Valle Los Ulmos, Chile, for their assistance with sampling at Calbuco Volcano and for their warm hospitality during our visits. The authors also wish to thank Professor Aharon Oren and Professor Ramon Rosselló-Móra for their valuable discussions on bacterial identification. The authors wish to thank Bertrand Lézé (University of East Anglia) for providing technical support with the cryo-SEM image preparation and acquisition. Robin A. Dawson was supported by Royal Society Research Fellows Enhanced grants awarded to Marcela Hernández (RF\ERE\210050 and RF\ERE\231066). Nicola Fantom is funded by a NERC Ph.D. studentship (ARIES-DTP NE/S007334/1). Marcela Hernández was supported by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship (DHF\R1\211076).

Funding

Robin A. Dawson was supported by Royal Society Research Fellows Enhanced grants awarded to Marcela Hernández (RF\ERE\210050 and RF\ERE\231066). Nicola Fantom is funded by a NERC Ph.D. studentship (ARIES-DTP NE/S007334/1). Marcela Hernández was supported by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship (DHF\R1\211076).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH conceived the project and secured the funding; MH and PA collected the samples and extracted DNA; RAD performed laboratory experiments; NF supported with the GC analysis; MH performed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence analysis; TMP and GK help constructing the coxL classifier. GK provided advice on the enrichment and isolation of bacteria; RAD and MH analysed the data; RAD and MH drafted the paper; all authors contributed to its revisions and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcela Hernández.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawson, R.A., Fantom, N., Martin-Pozas, T. et al. Carbon monoxide-oxidising Pseudomonadota on volcanic deposits. Environmental Microbiome 20, 12 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40793-025-00672-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40793-025-00672-y

Keywords