Fig. 6
From: Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures
Effects of bacterial communities from MPR, RPR, MPL, and RPL samples on the growth of F. oxysporum and A. alstroemeriae, and the development of root rot and leaf spot. a Effects of bacterial communities from MPR, RPR, MPL, and RPL samples on the growth of F. oxysporum. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). The asterisk indicates a significant difference between monocropped and rotated treatments according to the Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001). b Effects of bacterial communities from MPR, RPR, MPL, and RPL samples on the growth of A. alstroemeriae. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). The asterisk indicates a significant difference between monocropped and rotated treatments according to Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). c Effects of bacterial communities from MPR and RPR samples on the development of root rot caused by F. oxysporum. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The asterisk indicates a significant difference between monocropped and rotated treatments according to Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001). d Effects of bacterial communities from MPL and RPL samples on the development of leaf spot caused by A. alstroemeriae. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The asterisk indicates a significant difference between monocropped and rotated treatments according to Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). MPR, monocropped rhizosphere; RPR, rotated rhizosphere; MPL, monocropped leaf epiphyte; RPL, rotated leaf epiphyte; Fo, Fusarium oxysporum; Aa, Alternaria alstroemeriae; ns, no significance; n.d., no detected